Purchasing real estate is one of the biggest investments one can make in their lifetime, which is why it is so important to fully understand the associated legal implications. Can an offer to purchase be cancelled? What is a latent defect? A defect of consent? Interview with Martin Janson, real estate lawyer at Janson, Larente, Roy in Montreal.
The term “offer to purchase” is often used, but the correct term is actually “promise to purchase”. In this document, the buyer proposes an amount to the seller to acquire the property and sets a deadline for a response. Once the promise is signed, there is to a certain extent a contract. One party is obligated to purchase, while the other is obligated to sell. However, the buyer can stipulate conditions to the promise to purchase. The most common are obtaining the necessary financing, the sale of their current property, and a satisfactory inspection report.
Usually, no. There is no clause for changing one’s mind! If the buyer refuses to honour their commitment, the seller can sue for breach of contract. This is why it is imperative to be absolutely certain before signing a promise to purchase. One exception does exist: purchasing a new construction from a developer or a builder. In this case, the buyer has ten days to withdraw the promise. However, the developer can request a compensation that must not exceed 0.5% of the selling price.
This is a right granted by the owner of one property to the owner of a neighbouring property. For example, an individual who owns a lakeside home allows their neighbour to access their property to put their rowboat in the water. However, for the easement to be binding, a contract or agreement must be drawn up and published on the Quebec Land Register. So if a property affected by an easement is sold, the easement will continue to exist. The owner of the lakeside home will be obligated to let their neighbour circulate on their property, even if they do not want to. However, there will be no obligation toward the neighbour if the agreement with the previous owner is not listed on the Quebec Land Register. The concept of vested rights does not apply to easements (except if a change made to municipal regulations affects a property’s compliance).
Not necessarily. The problem must be serious enough to decrease the value of the house or prevent the buyer from fully enjoying it. A power outlet with reversed polarity is not serious, so does not constitute a latent defect. However, water infiltrations, the absence of a French drain, or foundations that are in poor condition are examples of potential latent defects.
Another criteria: the hidden defect is… hidden. It is not apparent during a routine visit of the house. However, if stains on the ceiling, the smell of humidity, or other indicators give a reason to suspect a problem, the buyer must be cautious and investigate further. If not, it will be difficult to convince a court that the problem is a latent defect. Finally, for the defect to be latent, it must have existed at the time the new owner purchased the house, and the previous owner must have been unaware of its existence.
You must notify the seller in writing as quickly as possible, ideally within six months. There is no specific deadline, but the Civil Code indicates that notice must be given within a reasonable period of time. The notice should mention that the previous owner has approximately ten days to assess the problem and take the necessary measures to remedy it. Most importantly, do not carry out repairs during this period. Since the seller is responsible for the quality of the building sold, they have the right to take care of it. Doing the work without giving the seller time to address the problem can be fatal if the issue of the latent defect is brought to court.
Is the problem urgent? If there is water infiltration, you can fix the problem before there is a new pool in your basement! But to preserve the right to sue, only do what is necessary to avoid further damage.
If the seller does not respond to the notice or refuses to make the necessary repairs, formal notice is sent to ensure repairs are made, failing which a lawsuit will be brought. If the previous owner does not comply, you can begin the repairs and sue. You have a delay of three years from the time the latent defect is discovered to bring a lawsuit. To increase your chances of winning, an expert should assess the latent defect. The expert must be impartial, meaning that they should not be hired to carry out the repairs.
There is no foolproof method. But to minimize the risk, it is important to get the house inspected before purchase. A true hidden defect is not visible, but an inspector can often find many indicators that the average buyer can miss. An inspection allows for a more comprehensive verification and can lead to the discovery of the problem before purchase. Legal proceedings for latent defects can take over two years and incur high legal fees. It is important to do everything possible to avoid this.
Under the Civil Code of Quebec, houses are sold with the warranty of quality. The seller of a property is thus required to guarantee the property is free from defects, except for those disclosed. To be released from this obligation, they can however sell without a legal warranty. In this case, the buyer will have no legal recourse against the seller if they discover a latent defect. Consequently, the buyer must be ready to assume this risk.
When the seller fails to disclose information or deliberately misleads the buyer to persuade them to purchase the building, they commit what is known as dolus (fraud) in legalese. This fraud nullifies the buyer’s consent since if they had known the truth, they would not have completed the transaction or would have negotiated a lower price. If the buyer can prove the seller withheld certain facts, they can be compensated.
Ed: There are major and complex differencies from a province to another in terms of real estate laws. It would be basically impossible to be exhaustive and relevant on this topic on a pan-Canadian scale. That’s why we made the choice to focus this interview uniquely on the Quebec’s context.
Any reproduction, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of National Bank of Canada.
The articles and information on this website are protected by the copyright laws in effect in Canada or other countries, as applicable. The copyrights on the articles and information belong to the National Bank of Canada or other persons. Any reproduction, redistribution, electronic communication, including indirectly via a hyperlink, in whole or in part, of these articles and information and any other use thereof that is not explicitly authorized is prohibited without the prior written consent of the copyright owner.
The contents of this website must not be interpreted, considered or used as if it were financial, legal, fiscal, or other advice. National Bank and its partners in contents will not be liable for any damages that you may incur from such use.
This article is provided by National Bank, its subsidiaries and group entities for information purposes only, and creates no legal or contractual obligation for National Bank, its subsidiaries and group entities. The details of this service offering and the conditions herein are subject to change.
The hyperlinks in this article may redirect to external websites not administered by National Bank. The Bank cannot be held liable for the content of external websites or any damages caused by their use.
Views expressed in this article are those of the person being interviewed. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of National Bank or its subsidiaries. For financial or business advice, please consult your National Bank advisor, financial planner or an industry professional (e.g., accountant, tax specialist or lawyer).